Samadrita's Reviews > Parable of the Sower

Parable of the Sower by Octavia E. Butler
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
13266158
For a long time I had naively held on to the notion that Octavia E. Butler is the African American counterpart to Ursula K. Le Guin - an assumption begotten out of the commonality that both their creations despite being shoehorned into the genre of science/speculative fiction epitomize realities of institutionalized sociopolitical inequities. Not only has my first foray into Butler's literary landscapes altered that idea greatly but compounded my respect for Le Guin's masterful way of letting the didactic veins in a narrative segue neatly with the plot pulse so that when one turns over the last page, the fatal blow to the gut has already been delivered along with the crucial message. Of course it is too early to discount Butler's calibre as a storyteller of grit but rest assured she is no Le Guin.

By this time I have devoured enough post-apocalyptic fiction to remain inoculated against both the horrors of disintegrating social orders relapsing into caveman-era violence and the poignancy of surviving groups regaining lost humanity and optimism in the end. But this does not mean I can remain unmoved in the face of even the umpteenth combination of potent story-telling, layered characterization and extrapolations of current reality to very probable catastrophic consequences in the future.
Rampant murder, mayhem, arson and pillage drive the plot ahead here. People get killed, raped, mutilated and cannibalized after every few pages. And yet none of the savagery of aforementioned actions registers with the reader.
To cut a long story short, 'Parable of the Sower' shows all the finesse of a bull in a china shop while revealing its many thematic concerns.

Lauren Olamina, the young adult protagonist, is a hyperempath with the ability to experience the physical pain of others and yet, ironically, it is her journal entries which are glaringly toneless and devoid of any discernible emotion. Even when she expresses her anguish at some tragic turn of events, only a resilient stoicism is palpable in her narrative voice. The occasional philosophical rumination that she rustles up hints at all the solemnity of fortune cookie sentiments. As is obvious from the blurb, there are issues of gender, class, race, sexual orientation, climate change and human conflict simmering beneath the surface of dystopian barbarity but they are all paraded one by one for the reader's benefit without a modicum of discretion. Sprinkling a narrative with sentences like 'So-and-so was also raped.' is hardly the ideal way to drive home the fact of pervasive misogyny.

Negatives aside, the book still deserves brownie points for the insightful commentary on religion if not for designating the individual capacity for empathy as the glue which binds together conflicting elements in a civilization.
Worship is no good without action. With action, it's only useful if it steadies you, focuses on your efforts, eases your mind.

In course of circumventing a minefield of dystopian evils in search of a safe haven, Lauren inadvertently establishes a new religious order centered more or less around the idea of secular humanism, intending it to be a guiding force to shape the future endeavours of the survivors she helps unite as a community. As per the aphorisms of Lauren's 'Book of Earthseed' aka the new age Bible, God is change, and only by accepting change and embracing the notion of diversity can the welfare of the human race be a realizable prospect. This is old wine in new bottle no doubt but there's an oh-so-unsubtle implication that although all core religious ideas are grounded in survivalist logic at the onset, they eventually fragment into toxic ideologies misused by various groups to advance their respective sectarian agendas.
The universe is God's self-portrait.

I am not really holding my breath but here's to hoping my next brush with Butler's writing fares better than this one.
334 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Parable of the Sower.
Sign In »

Quotes Samadrita Liked

Octavia E. Butler
“There is no end
To what a living world
Will demand of you.”
Octavia E. Butler, Parable of the Sower

Octavia E. Butler
“The world is full of painful stories. Sometimes it seems as though there aren't any other kind and yet I found myself thinking how beautiful that glint of water was through the trees.”
Octavia E. Butler, Parable of the Sower


Reading Progress

December 29, 2012 – Shelved
April 21, 2013 – Shelved as: 1001-and-more
April 21, 2013 – Shelved as: in-by-about-america
April 21, 2013 – Shelved as: dystopian-fiction
April 21, 2013 – Shelved as: post-apocalyptic
April 21, 2013 – Shelved as: by-women-who-matter
August 20, 2014 – Shelved as: sci-fi-speculative
February 3, 2015 – Started Reading
February 3, 2015 – Shelved as: feminism-feminist-undertones
February 3, 2015 – Shelved as: gender-studies-sexuality
February 7, 2015 –
14.0% "This 'tell all, show nothing' first person narrative is just not getting any better."
February 10, 2015 –
28.0% ""Civilization, like intelligence, may serve well, serve adequately, or fail to serve its adaptive function. When civilization fails to serve, it must disintegrate unless it is acted upon by unifying internal or external forces.""
February 11, 2015 –
54.0% "I can't figure out what annoys me more about this book - the lack of any quoteworthy sentences or its abject failure to create any emotional resonance."
February 12, 2015 – Shelved as: my-god-is-better-than-yours
February 12, 2015 –
72.0% ""The penalty for being too poor to be worth robbing is a beating, a rape, and/or death.""
February 12, 2015 – Shelved as: sort-of-good
February 12, 2015 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-50 of 64 (64 new)


message 1: by Lynne (new)

Lynne King Samadrita,

I may not wish to read this book but I must confess that this is a beautifully written review and really flows.


message 2: by Mariel (new)

Mariel I love your writing. You are a balm.

I haven't read this but this could apply to her Kindred (which I found so so underwhelming).


message 3: by Fionnuala (new)

Fionnuala I learned a new word, Sam - hyperempath!
Glad to see you reminding us how good Le Guin is!


Samadrita Lynne wrote: "Samadrita,

I may not wish to read this book but I must confess that this is a beautifully written review and really flows."


Thank you, Lynne. I do not blame you for deciding to give this one a miss.


Samadrita Mariel wrote: "I love your writing. You are a balm.

I haven't read this but this could apply to her Kindred (which I found so so underwhelming)."


Oh no there goes my bubble of hope for Butler. I'll probably just pick her Dawn next time then. Glad you liked the review, Mariel.


Samadrita Fionnuala wrote: "I learned a new word, Sam - hyperempath!
Glad to see you reminding us how good Le Guin is!"


She is. I'll be looking forward to the time you review Le Guin.


message 7: by Sookie (new)

Sookie That was a wonderful review, Samadrita.
Have you read - The_Ones_Who_Walk_Away_from_Omelas by LeGuin? Its a wonderful little short story and I think you will enjoy it.


message 8: by Ted (last edited Feb 13, 2015 09:31AM) (new) - added it

Ted What a masterfully written review, Samadrita. I'm sure a grader far more qualified that I would give it the A++ treatment. ;)
(view spoiler)


message 9: by Lily (new)

Lily Interesting! I have been curious about Butler for a while, and had also vaguely (and I guess inaccurately) associated her with Le Guin. I'll hopefully give one of Butler's books a try at some point.

Your review also reminds me that there are a few more Le Guin books that I want to read. :)


message 10: by Praj (new)

Praj Chinguya, your exuberant text ruminating within the unpretentious practicality laced with decisive versatility and razor sharp pitch brings a lingering grin. The prospects of me picking this book are not favourable. But, do you have to pen such incredible reviews, all the time, uri kyeopta chingu :)


message 11: by Cheryl (new)

Cheryl Great review, Samadrita. I don't know too much about post-apocalyptic fiction, so thank goodness for reviews like yours. I especially loved this succinct analysis: "To cut a long story short, 'Parable of the Sower' shows all the finesse of a bull in a china shop while revealing its many thematic concerns." I've been meaning to read Kindred for some time now, so thanks for letting me know that "Parable" is not the way to start Butler.


message 12: by Dolors (last edited Feb 13, 2015 05:34PM) (new)

Dolors Another critique that runs smooth and deep, Sama. There are many memorable sentences in this review, but your shrewd deconstruction of themes, writing style and the protagonist is what will remain with me. Lauren appears to be more plot-driven than psychologically well-rounded, maybe even sacrificed for the sake of the thematic discourse, something I guess doesn't occur in Le Guin's books. So I have learned today that when I decide to jump into post-apocalyptic fiction I will make of Le Guin my first stop. Thanks for making my reading choices informed and pleasant, Sama!:)


Samadrita @Caitlin & Lily:-I am glad I wasn't the only one who held on to that notion, naively.

@Sookie:-Thank you! And no I haven't yet. I'll certainly put it on the tbr list. For now I have this plan to read all the books of her Hainish Cycle series first (I've just read two of them).


Samadrita Ted wrote: "What a masterfully written review, Samadrita. I'm sure a grader far more qualified that I would give it the A++ treatment. ;)
[spoilers removed]"


Ha! I make all the best efforts to not let my GR reviews resemble school essays but sometimes I can't help it I suppose. Glad to know you would have given it A++ though. 8)


message 15: by Samadrita (last edited Mar 17, 2015 09:18AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Samadrita Praj wrote: "Chinguya, your exuberant text ruminating within the unpretentious practicality laced with decisive versatility and razor sharp pitch brings a lingering grin. The prospects of me picking this book ..."

Kamsahamnida, chinguya for reading and leaving such nice comments which never fail to make me smile. I certainly understand why you wouldn't want to read Butler. I almost had to force myself to get through this book.


Samadrita Cheryl wrote: "Great review, Samadrita. I don't know too much about post-apocalyptic fiction, so thank goodness for reviews like yours. I especially loved this succinct analysis: "To cut a long story short, 'Par..."

I think I had a problem with her prose and the story-telling which is all 'tell, don't show'. I'll look out for your reactions to Kindred, Cheryl. Glad you liked the review.


Samadrita Dolors wrote: "Another critique that runs smooth and deep, Sama. There are many memorable sentences in this review, but your shrewd deconstruction of themes, writing style and the protagonist is what will remain ..."

Le Guin goes really deep and sometimes she has me grasping about for clues to where she is heading with a particular thread of plot but she always makes her point in the end like a true mistress of the craft while Butler leaves nothing to the imagination. Lauren isn't psychologically well-rounded at all - a spot on observation as always, Dolors. You never fail to leave insightful remarks about the books reviewed by others. Kudos! :)


message 18: by Leo (new) - added it

Leo Robertson I'm so happy to know someone who can get away with the phrase "institutionalized sociopolitical inequities". Brava for the review, Sami!!


Samadrita Leo wrote: "I'm so happy to know someone who can get away with the phrase "institutionalized sociopolitical inequities". Brava for the review, Sami!!"

:D Thank you, Leo.


message 20: by Adam (new)

Adam Great review. I've enjoyed the short stories I've read of Butler ("Bloodchild" and "Speech Sounds") quite a bit, and I'm currently reading Kindred, which is super compelling so far. Her prose style does strike me as unimpressive, but that's about the only thing about her that does. I think her thematic explorations of gender and identity (and now with Kindred, race) are something I don't see a lot of in genre fiction, and, at least with the stories I've read, I've enjoyed the uncomplicated ways her plots unfold.

I do wonder what you'd think of those stories, whether you'd be more impressed with Butler or still find her lacking. I don't have the Le Guin reference frame here (I got into Butler because of praise from Junot Diaz, which, because I do so adore him, certainly influenced how I approached her), but I've always been intrigued by her (Le Guin, that is). Where would be a good place to start?


Samadrita Adam wrote: "Great review. I've enjoyed the short stories I've read of Butler ("Bloodchild" and "Speech Sounds") quite a bit, and I'm currently reading Kindred, which is super compelling so far. Her prose style..."

I guess I just cannot deal with mediocre prose but I'll definitely give her another shot either with her short stories or Dawn. As for Le Guin, I read her The Left Hand of Darkness first and it blew me away. Now I'm on a mission to finish her entire Hainish Cycle series. I also read her The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas which is an ideal example of how a short story should be - succinct yet thematically potent. She is brilliant.


message 22: by mark (last edited Feb 18, 2015 12:51AM) (new)

mark monday disappointing! but you certainly articulate your criticism in a compelling way.

haven't read this one so can't really weigh in on it specifically.

regarding Le Guin vs. Butler, and Butler's prose in general. I definitely admire both authors.

I prefer Le Guin because I find her prose more to be more literary and her characterization more nuanced, and she's just overall more enjoyable to read. and I find her perspective on the human condition to be richer and certainly more idealistic than the more distancing Butler, an author who is deeply pessimistic about human nature (but who still allows some slight hope to surface through that). although I prefer Le Guin's point of view, I do have to admire Butler's more uncompromising vision.

Butler's prose is grey and flat, I think purposely so but I also think it is her own personal style. she emphasizes that flatness of tone and language, and for some reason that is just really striking to me. the almost robotic remove from her subjects, from her very own themes. it's absorbing in its own off-putting way.


message 23: by Samadrita (last edited Feb 19, 2015 03:13AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Samadrita mark wrote: "disappointing! but you certainly articulate your criticism in a compelling way.

haven't read this one so can't really weigh in on it specifically.

regarding Le Guin vs. Butler, and Butler's prose..."


I have no problems with Butler's pessimism but it's the way she delivers the message that leaves much to be desired, at least in terms of narrative technique. For me, her relentless 'tell, don't show' mode of writing was a chore to read through. But I'll be reading more of Butler in the future for sure.


Christine You need to check out Toshi Reagon. She's working on an opera based on this. Just saw the concert version last night. One of the most perfect things I have seen or heard.


Samadrita Chris wrote: "You need to check out Toshi Reagon. She's working on an opera based on this. Just saw the concert version last night. One of the most perfect things I have seen or heard."

I have seen some of her live performance videos on youtube. Will keep my eyes peeled for anything related to this one.


message 26: by [deleted user] (new)

Butler is not Le Guin, but I wouldn't call that a short-coming, though I love Le Guin as well. The aspects you criticized for lack of finesse or discretion, I admired for their bluntness. And it makes sense to me that a hyperempathic character in such an environment would be stoic with herself and others.


Samadrita Katharine wrote: "Butler is not Le Guin, but I wouldn't call that a short-coming, though I love Le Guin as well. The aspects you criticized for lack of finesse or discretion, I admired for their bluntness. And it ma..."

Appreciate your interpretation although I don't agree with any of it.


message 28: by Nandakishore (new) - added it

Nandakishore Mridula I loved the second part of this novel. I am yet to read this one.

I love her blunt and totally emotionless way of writing: a sort of "let it rain, let it snow, I don't care" sort of attitude. So most probably I will like this book for the same reasons you disliked it. ;)

This is why I come to GR again and again - the talented reviewers here put forth their analysis in such competent fashion that you know immediately what to expect from a book.


Samadrita Nandakishore wrote: "I loved the second part of this novel. I am yet to read this one.

I love her blunt and totally emotionless way of writing: a sort of "let it rain, let it snow, I don't care" sort of attitude. So m..."


Yes if you like Butler's style you'd also like this one probably. Like I mentioned before it's the 'tell don't show' mode of narration that got on my nerves. And I was expecting greater subtlety.


message 30: by Ted (new) - added it

Ted bookmarked. I think I'd quite like this novel. The overall story seems prescient, we may be heading in this direction quite directly.


Milana Most of the comments undermining Octavia's writing abilities are from non-Black people. This is interesting.


message 32: by W.B. (new) - rated it 4 stars

W.B. Abdullah I should write in my review “what she said” and link to you. I agree on many points. I’ve never read LeGuin but I love dystopia and Sci-fi—do you have a personal recommendation as the first LeGuin one should read? Thanks!


message 33: by Emma (new) - rated it 2 stars

Emma My reaction was similar to yours, but I think some of the lack of finesse may be Lauren’s not Butler’s (though the fact I’m not sure isn’t a good sign). I also think it’s worth remembering that the entire decade of the 90s was a grunge phase in response to the eighties, and this book is definitely a vicious criticism of the rise of the neo-cons (Donner, with his promise to make America great again, is clearly Reagan) that came along with the 80s’ stylized artificiality. In that regard, having everything blunt and exposed and unapologetic makes a certain amount of sense. Though I would agree that makes it a bit topical.

She is certainly capable of subtlety—in a nation where everyone fears cannibals, the president is named Donner, for example. I loved that one. I think she was going for something with the narrative style she just isn’t achieving.


Carrie I appreciate this review as I really felt the same - underwhelmed. I've heard much about Butler's substantial reputation, but I couldn't get excited about any aspect of this book. The prose is fairly good, but Lauren is difficult to like, the tension/suspense remains so constant as to become boring, and the religious stuff tired old pseudo-profundity. Oh well.


message 35: by Jane (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jane I've just read this book and - to my shame - have never read Le Guin. Which means that I am not trying to compare one writer to another. I found this book terrifying and prescient. The language is sparse, especially from Laurens POV but she repeatedly explains this - she cannot, as a hyperempath, let others know how much she feels. This has become her default way of being. I get that this book is not to your taste - reading your review I guess it was just not quite flashy enough for you...


message 36: by Mariel (new)

Mariel My understanding of Lauren's hyper-empathy is that she feels others' pain, not necessarily emotions. It can also make her more selfish, even if that sounds counterintuitive, since her survival and pain avoidance instincts will probably override any learned social empathy.


message 37: by Ella (new) - rated it 5 stars

Ella Harris wow! brownie points?? I strongly disagree with this review.


message 38: by Jade (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jade A flat affect and tone can be a symptom of PTSD and depression, which very much fits the world. I think it's absolutely appropriate for Lauren's tone to be like that, both to match the people around her as a camouflage, and potentially even from her own mental health perspective.


Carrie It’s not so much that it’s “inappropriate” or even unrealistic, it’s just a boring read.


Michele Cacano I agree with Jade. I'm only half way through the book, but I can barely put it down. I am drawn into the story, although I can see where the diary entry format could leave one with some of that "tell" feeling, I found the action was relayed enough to feel "in scene" for me.


Michele Cacano I agree with Jade. I'm only half way through the book, but I can barely put it down. I am drawn into the story, although I can see where the diary entry format could leave one with some of that "tell" feeling, I found the action was relayed enough to feel "in scene" for me.


message 42: by Golden (new)

Golden Brown Strongly disagree and deeply bored by the comparison to Le Guin. We agree that Le Guin is no Butler though.


message 43: by zoe (new) - rated it 2 stars

zoe I could not agree more. I LOVE le guinn and quite disliked this book for all the reasons you mention


Ashley Amazing review and perfectly captures why I didn’t love this book. Thank you


Carrie I’ve now read Left Hand of Darkness, and have found that too to be BORING, although, like Butler, well written. Maybe Samadrita or others here could recommend which Le Guinn books they find so good?


message 46: by Lynne (new)

Lynne Man, you use a lot of BIG words.


Ashley Campbell This book is about hope and building community. Having Lauren turn into an anti hero would make absolutely zero sense. I’m replying to Bea above. I didn’t read the full review because I got bored. Didn’t get too bored reading this book though. I did have to sit it down a few times because it’s triggering.


message 48: by M Ross (new) - added it

M Ross Perkins This is a phenomenally written review, and in my opinion it's perfectly accurate.


message 49: by Joe (new) - rated it 5 stars

Joe Any chance you’ve changed your views, given the events of the past year and a half? I found the realism disturbing, as I think this is something that could happen here, given the recent politics, riots, and lack of respect for the law.


message 50: by Qhira (new) - added it

Qhira Bonds Personally have not read this book yet BUT I find personal discomfort in the fact that you first refer to Butler as the “African American” counterpart to whoever this Le Guin author is, and then proceed to say that she does not compare. you probably won’t even read this comment, but this is for anyone else who has the same point of view. I just want you to realize how that comment is a tad problematic? Butler was a Black author who was her own person and had her own stories to tell. Do not insult her and limit her work by using a white author as a measurement of her success. Thank you, that is all.


« previous 1
back to top