Sign in with Facebook
Nika Kutsniashvili's Reviews > Pride and Prejudice
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Pride and Prejudice.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
May 19, 2018
– Shelved
May 19, 2018
– Shelved as:
reliastic-fiction
May 19, 2018
– Shelved as:
romance
Started Reading
May 20, 2018
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-34 of 34 (34 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Liv
(new)
Aug 30, 2022 11:59AM
..what?
reply
|
flag
Hahaha I join you in the minority of people who don't ADORE this book.
This is what happens when the coho fans discover classics 😭
I love this review.It makes me laugh, every time I see it. :D
Disagree, but I love this review.
(Disagree because Austen's works were never meant to be romance novels, and she gave the literary world so many new elements (free indirect speech, for example), that reducing them to this one aspect shows that Austen is misunderstood by those people seeing only the romantic element in her stories.)
if that's all that you have to can say about it, you may be the one who should have less. You know... just so you have more time to read and stuff like that...
Haha I think in those days they’d want to kill you if you did it before marriage. Your modern romance this is not.
I’m still reading the book I’m half way, and crucify me if you like but I am LOVING it so far and I think ima rate it 5 stars after anyways, this is what I’ve been saying this whole time I may not agree with the 1 star rating (so far) but the “Jesus Christ just have sex is absolute gold
That is not the point of the book; it is not an erotica nor a sex themed book. It was written in Victorian England, a time when women had little opinion and opportunity. For people saying this is not a modern romance think again, this book has modern ideas of women’s empowerment and feminism.
Ew I bet you love coleen hoover
I love this review. I’m reading this for the first time, incredibly, and while I’m enjoying it for what it is, I keep thinking, “It’s like they wanted to convince the world that they didn’t have genitalia…”
oh my god the way i snorted
I’m sure this review was given by a child who cannot understand the refined true romance that existed back then. Shame
Que comentario más ridículo y hueco!
Go watch porn or read Bridgeton. dumb people be dumbing.
How about you pick a Colleen Hoover book instead because this is clearly not all about smut
It's book written in the late 18th century, what did you expect. Like of course it doesn't have smut
Interesting how Jesus Christ was in this book. Sarcasm why do we use God’s name in vain?
1 star because there is no sex? girl let’s be serious, if you like smut go watch 50 shades of grey not pride and prejudice
the reason why I hate this generation
Weird way to say that you are a Corn addict but alright, I guess
Carly wrote: "That is not the point of the book; it is not an erotica nor a sex themed book. It was written in Victorian England, a time when women had little opinion and opportunity. For people saying this is n..."Not Victorian, it's Regency, you fool.
XAXAXAXAXAXAXAXAXAXA
